Re: 13.1.2 Warnings

Ari Luotonen wrote:
> > OK, here's my creative solution ... a 1.1 proxy receiving a Warning
> > should make the entity look out-of-date to any 1.0 clients. The
> > Warning can then be safely cached in 1.0 caches, because it will be
> > cleared by a fresh copy of the same entity without the Warning which
> > looks more up-to-date than the cached copy.
> I would consider that kind of distortion of meta data to be bad.  I
> think we're going too far if we're starting to modify our response to
> fool 1.0 cache to do what 1.1 prefers.  May as well just send a
> standard error message saying "buzz off 1.0 cache, you need to upgrade
> to 1.1, or I will forever torture you with bogus responses that will
> confuse you out of your little mind".
> Either (1) live with it (this only occurs with cascades), or (2)
> suppress the warning headers when giving a response to 1.0 cache (with
> the possible exception of "14 Transformation applied").  I would
> prefer (2).

I didn't say it was a good idea, just that it was creative. If Jeff wants
creativity, who am I to deny him? ;-)

I've already stated my preference. I'm in agreement with you.



Ben Laurie                  Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435
Freelance Consultant and    Fax:   +44 (181) 994 6472
Technical Director          Email:
A.L. Digital Ltd,           URL:
London, England.            Apache Group member (

Received on Friday, 18 October 1996 13:51:24 UTC