Larry Masinter wrote: > > > Larry, it would seem a slight rewording of the warning Note: would be > > appropriate given the wording of the definition of semantic transparancy. > > We're not going to change the HTTP/1.1 RFC at this point: it's > important to let it progress, with the understanding that it's a > Proposed Standard. I'm not really worried about jeopardizing the > 'Draft Standard' status of a revision, either. > > The main concern I have is that we keep a complete and coherent list > of editorial revisions. The mailing list archive isn't sufficient, > since the traffic level is high. I'm soliciting for a donation of > 'forum' space on someone's distributed web collaboration tool that > would let us maintain this. Any donors? If no web-based tools are available (and, to be honest, I doubt the state of the art is such that we would all be able to use it with ease) can I suggest CVS? Cheers, Ben. -- Ben Laurie Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435 Freelance Consultant and Fax: +44 (181) 994 6472 Technical Director Email: ben@algroup.co.uk A.L. Digital Ltd, URL: http://www.algroup.co.uk London, England. Apache Group member (http://www.apache.org)Received on Thursday, 17 October 1996 15:34:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:00 UTC