- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 1995 12:28:57 PST
- To: gaines@cpsc.ucalgary.ca
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
I think your comments on the cachability of POST requests are well-taken. I would guess that the v10 specification, as an Informational RFC describing 'current' practice, should soften the wording to describe what current clients and servers actually DO. As for HTTP/1.1, there's a cache subgroup that will be meeting, and perhaps they can deal with caching of other methods. (My guess is that the 'method' and attached data can just be added to the set of input parameters that might affect the output of a HTTP call, and that the primary difference between GET and POST is the presumption of Expires: for POST is 'immediate'.)
Received on Sunday, 31 December 1995 12:32:20 UTC