W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 1995

Re: 'PUT' transaction reconsidered (was Re: two-phase send concerns )

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 20:07:14 PST
To: khare@w3.org
Cc: rafal@jaka.nn.com, mslevine@theory.lcs.mit.edu, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <95Dec13.200714pst.2733@golden.parc.xerox.com>

What do you do when the lease expires just when the client does the
PUT?

How do you know how long to lease the document for? Why not always ask
for more than you need? For infinite leases?

I've seen a lot of version management systems around, and I've never
seen any with leases. Why do you imagine this is EVER a good idea?

Received on Wednesday, 13 December 1995 20:10:45 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd: "Re: Registration (was Re: DRAFT Minutes, HTTP-WG)"
Previous message: Larry Masinter: "minutes, HTTP Working Group"
In reply to: Rohit Khare: "Re: 'PUT' transaction reconsidered (was Re: two-phase send concerns )"
Next in thread: Alex Hopmann: "Re: 'PUT' transaction reconsidered (was Re: two-phase send concerns )"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:57 UTC