- From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 13:27:39 +0100 (MET)
- To: Shel Kaphan <sjk@amazon.com>
- Cc: koen@win.tue.nl, fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU, mogul@pa.dec.com, dmk@allegra.att.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Shel Kaphan: > >Koen Holtman writes: > ... > > Another question: what is the > > `appropriate comparison function' server authors are supposed to use > > for `Content-Version'? Do we really want to open this can of worms? > >If Content-Version is going to be used to hold an opaque identifier, >then the only appropriate comparison operators are `eq' and `ne'. I agree that the only approprate version comparison operators are `eq' and `ne'. My point was that, in my reading of the 1.1 spec, server authors would also be required to think up an `appropriate' `gt' comparison function. >--Shel Koen.
Received on Monday, 4 December 1995 04:33:44 UTC