I went out to http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/ and downloaded the postscript versions of the HTTP protocol documents. The link under the "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0" is to draft-ietf-http-v10-spec-04 and the one under "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1" points at draft-ietf-http-v10-spec-01. I don't want to understand how that naming convention works :-) but I do want to know: 1. Why both documents are titled HTTP/1.0? 2. Why the document, supposedly for HTTP/1.1, is dated August and the HTTP/1.0 is dated October? 3. Are these the correct documents? 4. Is PUT part of the HTTP/1.1 spec? I'm just confused, BradReceived on Wednesday, 22 November 1995 11:26:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:56 UTC