- From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 08:20:56 -0500
- To: sjk@amazon.com
- Cc: wsuhanic@acs.ryerson.ca, ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
>1. Should there be one uniform syntax for addressing sub-parts of >"structured resources" independently of the content-type? Yes, which is precisely what HyTime does. I can do the same thing in LISP. I cannot imagine a way to define a general adressing scheme without also making the addresses almost impossible to remember though... in an ideal world, one would not see most of these links "in the raw" anyway. >On (2), since there is little guarantee of an association between a >URL and any particular data type, and decreasingly so a >content-negotiated world, I think it is a mistake to tie sub-part >addressing into URLs. I tend to agree.
Received on Monday, 20 November 1995 05:20:46 UTC