>I've seen a number of requests for a more formal specification for CGI >than <URL:http://hoohoo.ncsa.uiuc.edu/cgi/>. > >This leads to the following questions: > >1) Is CGI appropriate for an RFC? If not, what standards group would > it belong to? The W3C, probably, if they were interested. > 2) If it's appropriate for an RFC, is this this WG it would belong to? > If not, which does it belong to? www-talk, I suppose. > 3) Is anyone working on such a thing now? Yes. I have written a fairly formal specification of CGI. See <URL:http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~drtr/cgi.html> David Robinson.Received on Thursday, 9 November 1995 02:36:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:56 UTC