- From: Martijn Koster <m.koster@webcrawler.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 11:22:21 -0700
- To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
We noticed clients are sending out requests with byte ranges, on GIF's etc. Apache takes them as part of the filename, as the CERN httpd reportedly does also, and the request fails. The byte range draft I found says: > In a case when byte ranges aren't meaningful the client doesn't > request them (why would it?), and the server should tag them as > invalid requests (in case someone wrote them by hand). The thing is that in this case the request makes sense, but isn't implemented. However, returning Not_implemented might be taken as the GET method not being implemented for any resource, which isn't quite right either. If I ignore the byte range and return the whole thing, I'm breaking the draft's requirement to return a multipart MIME message (althoug I don't see why it couldn't figure this out for itself). I feel like returning BAD_REQUEST because the client is making up URL's I never published, and creates a headache, and should stop it :-) Of course if I had lots of spare time I could try and implement this draft, but that's going a bit far. So, what is the correct response? -- Martijn __________ Email: m.koster@webcrawler.com WWW: http://info.webcrawler.com/mak/mak.html
Received on Thursday, 26 October 1995 11:26:17 UTC