- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 14:49:51 PDT
- To: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
- Cc: fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
> Wouldn't a hash containing accept: */* hash to a different value > than the hash not containing it? > Why then bother with a flag? Servers with only one representation for a given URL (the 99% case) need to know whether they need to expand a hash they've never seen. If the request is accept: */*, then they don't.
Received on Monday, 23 October 1995 14:54:39 UTC