- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 14:12:25 PDT
- To: mbrown@openmarket.com
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, mbrown@openmarket.com
I thought that we had found some other ways of achieving what the original authors had wanted with the 'bytes' suggestion to the point where draft-luotonen-http-url-byterange-00.txt might be abandoned. Primarily, the issue was that what with content negotiation and changes in media type, packing the 'bytes' into the URL wasn't the best way to express this request. I think that's why the draft wasn't updated. So why are you implementing it?
Received on Wednesday, 27 September 1995 15:03:26 UTC