Re: domain-name?

> I'm not into compromises today.  Either we go with the Orig-URI header
> as specified in draft 01, or we go with
> 
>   Host: fully.qualified.domain.name
> 
> as I originally suggested in
> 
>   <http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/hypermail/1995q1/0088.html>
> 
> I am calling for WG consensus on this issue RIGHT NOW.  If you have
> a preference either way, send your comment in RIGHT NOW.  If some
> degree of rough consensus can be obtained within the next 5 days,
> then I will include the decision in HTTP/1.1 draft 00.

My vote goes for Host: fqdn, required in HTTP/1.1 requests, simply 
because it saves bytes and if the server needs the whole URL, it 
can construct it.
	--MLM

Received on Thursday, 21 September 1995 16:53:32 UTC