- From: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 95 14:13:51 PDT
- To: mogul@pa.dec.com
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
I like Jeff's proposal. Would it mean that we could nuke "Expires: yesterday", or is it embedded in current practice? ---------- ] From: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com> ] To: Shel Kaphan <sjk@amazon.com> ] Cc: <netmail!http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com> ] Subject: Re: Still trying to make sense of HTTP caching model ] Date: Wednesday, September 06, 1995 11:29AM ] ] One thing I *do* hate about this is that "expires: <right now>" has ] problems because of clock skew, but otherwise that would seem to ] make more sense intuitively than "expires: yesterday". ] ] You may want to look at the proposal I sent last month for using ] the server's current date to de-skew Expiration times. We may simply ] want to make Date: mandatory for responses with an Expires: header. ] If Date: > Expires:, then the meaning should be unambiguous. ] ] -Jeff ]
Received on Wednesday, 6 September 1995 15:03:46 UTC