Re: Comments on draft-v10-03a.

] >>8.11  Location
] [...]
] >In any case, from the discussion it would seem best not to add Location
] >to 2xx and simply provide 303 See Other instead.
]
] I don't mind if Location goes, the caching benefit of having Location would
] not be that great.

>From the discussion, the primary value of Location seemed to be when 
using POST, to know exactly the URI assigned (if any), for the 
"shopping basket" scenario.
I didn't see arguments against the value of the usage, and since the 
problems arose when trying to cache using Location (e.g., the security 
issue) as a key, if we don't try and cache, I don't remember any problems.

I interpreted the discussion as: don't try to use Location to cache, 
but keep it in.

Paul

Received on Friday, 1 September 1995 09:32:33 UTC