Re: Idempotent

• From: <Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no>
• Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 11:56:00 +0200
• To: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
• Cc: http-wg-request%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Message-Id: <199508310956.LAA01447@dale.uninett.no>

Why not use "cacheable" instead of "idempotent"?

        Harald A

Received on Thursday, 31 August 1995 02:58:53 UTC