Re: Comments on draft-v10-03a.

> Though I generally agree with what you're saying, there's a slight
> problem with this, I think.  If the first GET on a URL has side
> effects necessary to the semantics intended by the server, then it has
> to avoid being served from a cache.

How'd it get into the cache if it was never GET-ed in the first place?
Immaculate HTML?

Received on Wednesday, 30 August 1995 12:05:54 UTC