- From: Paul Hoffman <ietf-lists@proper.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 09:11:37 -0700
- To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
>Idempotent I second the request for a clear definition in the context of this spec. Another good reason for this: idempotent is not in any dictionary (including my Webster's unabridged) that I could find.
Received on Wednesday, 30 August 1995 09:11:56 UTC