- From: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 13:50:09 PDT
- To: dror@vocaltec.com, http-wg-request%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
I like the notion of partial entity transfer. However, I would prefer that content-length always refer to the transmitted length of the content, for all requests. Siince you're intorducing new header fields, why not add one for the total-length of the entity? The proposal allows fetch of the tail of a file. If we go down this path, why not generalize it to an arbitrary slice? Is this makes caches more efficient, why forbid its use by cache servers? Paul ---------- ] From: Dror Tirosh <dror@vocaltec.com> ] To: <netmail!http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>; <dror@vocaltec.com> ] Subject: Suggestion: Partial file transfer. ] Date: Saturday, August 24, 1901 10:37PM ] ] A suggestion for a new Header field to support partial file transfer. In the normal ] use of HTTP with HTML, many (most?) transfer activities are aborted. This makes a ] cache much less efficient, as it have to re-start the file transfer from its ] beginning. [ excised stuff]
Received on Thursday, 24 August 1995 13:55:18 UTC