- From: Shel Kaphan <sjk@amazon.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 1995 15:22:57 -0700
- To: Balint Nagy Endre <bne@bne.ind.eunet.hu>
- Cc: Roy Fielding <fielding@beach.w3.org>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Balint Nagy Endre writes: ... > There is an unanswered (on this list at least) proposal by Shel Kaphan > to introduce event-driven document expiration. For the record, the message I gave that title to was (if memory serves) really about the fact that I wanted there to be a response header that identified the resource, so that caches would have a unique cache key for a resource. I got what I wanted: Location can now be used for 2xx responses. What I didn't get (unless this has changed since last reading) was language in the spec describing the impact on caches of this header for 2xx responses. --Shel Kaphan
Received on Friday, 18 August 1995 15:28:00 UTC