- From: Shel Kaphan <sjk@amazon.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 1995 00:27:26 -0700
- To: brian@organic.com, sjk@amazon.com
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, masinter@parc.xerox.com
Of course your example is right. The questionable area is whether it is reasonable to expect servers to set last-modified = the date of the last modification to the data that went into producing the dynamic document in question, or whether it is legit for them to say last-modified = date of production of the actual document that is transmitted. My entire argument rests on the assumption that the latter will be done. If that isn't going to work, I recommend it be made explicit somewhere, as the failure mode will be subtle -- just a lot of mysteriously uncacheable documents. --Shel
Received on Thursday, 17 August 1995 00:32:53 UTC