- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 1995 02:20:06 PDT
- To: dmk@allegra.att.com
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
a) I think we should pay attention to Harald's request that we not call it a C-T-E. Even though we can justify that usage ourselves, there's no harm in using a different header in HTTP, is there? b) I'll give up calling for a string-terminated boundary marker if no one else thinks it is worthwhile. c) So far the HTTP WG has avoided specifying what happens with CGI -- it's out of scope of the WG, platform dependent, etc. However, changes to HTTP do affect CGI, so should be considered.
Received on Tuesday, 1 August 1995 02:22:27 UTC