- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 1995 12:53:14 -0800
- To: Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu
- Cc: html-wg@oclc.org, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
My apologies for cross-posting this, but it does apply to both standards.
Albert Lunde wrote:
> In any case, I think the language attribute should have the same
> allowed values as the language/dialect in the HTTP Accept-Language and
> Content-Language headers.
This has been changed for HTTP/1.0. We will now be using the language tag
defined in <draft-ietf-mailext-lang-tag-02.txt> which will (hopefully) soon
be an RFC. A full URL is
<http://ds.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mailext-lang-tag-02.txt>
Since it uses ISO 639 as primary tags, it should be compatible with current
usage of language names.
......Roy Fielding ICS Grad Student, University of California, Irvine USA
<fielding@ics.uci.edu>
<URL:http://www.ics.uci.edu/dir/grad/Software/fielding>
Received on Thursday, 9 February 1995 13:18:47 UTC