Re: Comments on the HTTP/1.0 draft.

Chuck Shotton writes:

> IMHO, it should state that CR, LF, and CRLF should all be interpreted
> equally as EOL when used as line ends. This avoids any problems with
> machine dependent EOL symbols, and fairly represents the current practice.
> (It also avoids forcing clients and especially servers to do line-by-line
> translations of EOL for all outgoing response information, which is a BIG
> performance hit.)

Sounds reasonable to me.

......Roy Fielding   ICS Grad Student, University of California, Irvine  USA

Received on Thursday, 1 December 1994 18:18:25 UTC