W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1996

Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 19:04:46 -0700
To: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <9609251904.aa08155@paris.ics.uci.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1627
> In view of these results, the next version of the conneg draft will
> use `Negotiate: tcn' to indicate support for transparent content
> negotiation.  If you can think of something shorter than `Negotiate:
> tcn', please let me know.

I would prefer `Negotiate: t' myself, since the 'cn' serves no useful
purpose given the context.  I was thinking of using `Negotiate: a'
for pure agent-driven negotiation (without the proxy mumbo jumbo).

 ...Roy T. Fielding
    Department of Information & Computer Science    (fielding@ics.uci.edu)
    University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3425    fax:+1(714)824-4056
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 1996 19:19:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:16:20 UTC