W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1994

Re: Closure on canonicalization, I hope

From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 1994 20:45:01 -0500
Message-Id: <199412240145.UAA09698@ebt-inc.ebt.com>
To: masinter@parc.xerox.com
Cc: mvanheyn@cs.indiana.edu, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
I was just on the verge of finishing up a paper explaining the issues,
and proposing use of UTF etc. I will still send this out as it's
relevant for browser writers, and HTML authors.

Just to clarify, in Larry's proposal, the Accept-charset is not required
because we can do the same thing via:

   Accept: text/html; charset=xxxx

However, how do we handle text/sgml, text/plaintext etc? Can they be
handled the same way, or do we still need Accept-charset.

I will be sending out my text tommorrow.
Received on Friday, 23 December 1994 17:44:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:16:10 UTC