W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-discuss@w3.org > November 2002

Re: draft-shemsedinov-usp-05.txt

From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 08:35:13 -0800
Message-ID: <184119162917.20021105083513@brandenburg.com>
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
CC: discuss@apps.ietf.org, Timur Shemsedinov <Timur@niist.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua>


Wednesday, December 31, 1969, 8:10:12 PM, you wrote:
Patrik> I have as Area Director got a request to publish the named I-D as 
Patrik> Informational RFC. I hereby would like to get input from the 
Patrik> Applications Area on the document.

Given that that they are seeking Informational, rather than standards track,
I assume that an IETF review should focus on whether the specification has
misrepresentations and whether it conflicts in dangerous ways with any IETF
effort. I assume that the IETF should NOT offer any standards-oriented
language, such as "this looks like a useful protocol".

So, my own reading is:

This is a thoughtful effort that discusses related efforts. It states what
problem it is trying to solve and it states its reasons for its technical

I am not aware of any conflicts or misrepresentations from this work.

For work of this sort done now, it is surprising that the specification
invents a new syntax, rather than using XML. However is nothing "dangerous"
or otherwise inappropriate in the syntax choice they have made.

 Dave Crocker  <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
 TribalWise <http://www.tribalwise.com>
 t +1.408.246.8253; f +1.408.850.1850
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 11:47:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:08:17 UTC