- From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:05:49 +0100
- To: "Marshall T. Rose" <mrose+mtr.netnews@dbc.mtview.ca.us>, <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
- Cc: "Marshall Rose" <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
At 09.15 -0800 01-01-18, Marshall T. Rose wrote: >may i ask that you and ned send email to each of the WGs in question, >comparing their progress to their charter, and giving them a short amount of >time to show progress or be nuke'd. We are NOT after killing things because it is fun. We want progress. If either this mail from me, or a future ping from me and Ned make the wg start work again, fine. >a charter represents a contract between the ADs and a WG. the reasons that >charters have milestones with dates is so that everyone can understand the >timeliness and metabolism of the project and principals. Exactly! >when WGs go stale but don't die, they prevent other WGs from being formed. >this is plainly unfair... Exactly my point in my initial message. wg's _DO_ use resources just by existing. paf -- Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com> Internet Engineering Task Force Area Director, Applications Area http://www.ietf.org Phone: (Stockholm) +46-8-4494212 (San Jose) +1-408-525-0940 PGP: 2DFC AAF6 16F0 F276 7843 2DC1 BC79 51D9 7D25 B8DC
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2001 13:10:13 UTC