W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-discuss@w3.org > February 1999

Re: Last Call: HTTP Extension Framework to Proposed Standard

From: Koen Holtman <Koen.Holtman@cern.ch>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 19:33:15 +0100 (MET)
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
cc: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>, iesg@ietf.org, ietf-http-ext@w3.org, discuss@apps.ietf.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95a.990218191318.15293I-100000@suncms33.cern.ch>

On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:

> At 11:28 2/18/99 +0100, Koen Holtman wrote:
> >The MUST/MAY/SHOULD text in the draft can be fixed, and I am trying to
> >work on this with Henrik, but I have no idea whether we will
> >converge.  I do feel that Henrik is not treating the issue with the
> >care it deserves.
> Koen,
> Before you go on saying what can be fixed and what not can be fixed in the
> current draft I think it would be instructive to point out that you have
> yet to identify a correctness problem in the *current*design* based on what
> is *supported* by the specification.

Sigh.  I have identified some.  See my discussion of sections 5.1 (last
point made) and the last remark about section 9 in my original last call
comments to the IESG.

This is all fixable, I believe some of the edits you proposed afterwards
fixed at least some of the section 9 stuff.  You already fixed the
second-to-last 5.1 point for me by pointing out how to get around it.  I
see a definite possibility of converging on this, don't worry. 

Then there is the 'Sec 5 para after enumerated list' thing about tunneling
for unknown methods.  You should really cross-check this with Jeff if you
don't trust my claim that this is not in http/1.1.  I have been known to
be wrong but I don't think I am wrong about this one.  Alternatively,
point me to the appropriate line in the 1.1 spec.

I am much more worried about us converging on my issues re. sec 5 point 3
and sec 5 point 4, and these have little to do with caching.

> Henrik

Received on Thursday, 18 February 1999 13:36:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:08:05 UTC