- From: <spreitze@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 11:29:52 PST
- To: Chris Newman <chris@innosoft.com>
- Cc: spreitze@parc.xerox.com, discuss@apps.ietf.org
> I'd say it would be an option for ... > ... new services that are not an explicitly documented > purpose of an IETF standards track protocol. Is it aimed at new IETF protocols, new non-IETF protocols, or both? > > What will be the requirements for efficiency? ... > What does this have to do with the proposed charter? Are you suggesting > the charter needs explicit efficiency constraints? I can't predict what > people who attend the BOF/WG will find to be important constraints. Well, I certainly can't claim to be an authority on how to write a successful charter, but I was thinking that a useful part of the chartering process would be to look into the question of what, if anything, is the consensus on efficiency requirements.
Received on Thursday, 11 February 1999 14:32:55 UTC