- From: Patrik Fältström <paf@swip.net>
- Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 19:50:08 +0100
- To: Koen Holtman <Koen.Holtman@cern.ch>, "Josh Cohen (Exchange)" <joshco@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>, "Yaron Goland (Exchange)" <yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com>, "Yaron Goland (Exchange)" <yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com>, Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>, moore@cs.utk.edu, discuss@apps.ietf.org, "Peter Ford (Exchange)" <peterf@Exchange.Microsoft.com>, Koen Holtman <Koen.Holtman@cern.ch>
--On 99-12-08 15.50 +0100 Koen Holtman <Koen.Holtman@cern.ch> wrote: >> Well, its no good if a standards track document cant reference it. > > You can't reference it, but can't you just do a copy&paste of the parts > you need? You have to differ between normative and non-normative references. It is only normative references which can not be made in whatever way you want. In most cases the difference between a normative and non-normative is just a matter of wording. So, if you just is careful you can have your document going to proposed with (non-normative) references to documents which are experimental. paf
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 1999 13:51:51 UTC