- From: Werner Donné <werner.donne@re.be>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 10:49:15 +0200
- To: Manfred Baedke <manfred.baedke@greenbytes.de>
- Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Hi Manfred, Shouldn't then a pre-condition be added in section 13.8 of RFC 3253, analogous to the one in section 3.13? Regards, Werner. Manfred Baedke wrote: > Hi Werner, > > This is of course allowed, IMHO. More generally, a server is allowed to > reject the deletion of any resource for whatever reason. > > Regards, > Manfred > > Werner Donné wrote: >> Hi, >> >> When an activity is deleted all references to it should be removed. >> Versions that have the activity in their activity-set, for example, >> should have their activity-set updated. Versions, which were created >> on a branch represented by the activity, all of the sudden are not >> on that branch anymore and in an implicit way. This seems rather >> strange and dangerous. Would it be allowed to reject the deletion >> of the activity in this case? >> >> Regards, >> >> Werner. >> > > -- Werner Donné -- Re Engelbeekstraat 8 B-3300 Tienen tel: (+32) 486 425803 e-mail: werner.donne@re.be
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2006 08:48:13 UTC