- From: Manfred Baedke <manfred.baedke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 10:39:34 +0200
- To: werner.donne@re.be
- CC: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Hi Werner, This is of course allowed, IMHO. More generally, a server is allowed to reject the deletion of any resource for whatever reason. Regards, Manfred Werner Donné wrote: > Hi, > > When an activity is deleted all references to it should be removed. > Versions that have the activity in their activity-set, for example, > should have their activity-set updated. Versions, which were created > on a branch represented by the activity, all of the sudden are not > on that branch anymore and in an implicit way. This seems rather > strange and dangerous. Would it be allowed to reject the deletion > of the activity in this case? > > Regards, > > Werner. >
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2006 08:39:46 UTC