- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 14:28:20 +0200
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
- Cc: "Kazeroni, Ladan" <Ladan.Kazeroni@softwareag.com>, "Nevermann, Dr., Peter" <Peter.Nevermann@softwareag.com>, "Wallmer, Martin" <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>
Wait-a-minute :-) > From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org > [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:19 PM > To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org; ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > Cc: Kazeroni, Ladan; Nevermann, Dr., Peter; Wallmer, Martin > Subject: RE: DASL and DELTA-V properties > > > > I agree with Julian. DAV:allprop SEARCH should be defined to > have the same behavior as DAV:allprop. In particular, it > should not search RFC-3253 properties. Yes, it should SEARCH them (if used in the where clause). No, it shouldn't report them (when select uses allprop). > The current proposal for the next revision of 2518 is that > it should only search dead properties and properties > defined in RFC-2518. sed s/search/report/
Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 08:28:51 UTC