- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 17:21:51 -0500
- To: "Ietf-Dav-Versioning@W3. Org" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
The UPDATE method explicitly identifies the "update target" for the "update source", so there is no need for such a rule (i.e. you can only update a version-controlled-configuration with a baseline from the baseline history of that version-controlled configiguration). So this statement (which is about how to find the merge target for a baseline MERGE request) is not needed for UPDATE. Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Roy Seto [mailto:Roy.Seto@oracle.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:34 PM To: Ietf-Dav-Versioning@W3. Org Subject: Clarification: extended baseline semantics of UPDATE Section 12.14, which defines the extended baseline semantics of MERGE, includes the statement If the merge source is a baseline, the merge target is a version- controlled configuration for the baseline history of that baseline, where the baseline-controlled collection of that version-controlled configuration is a member of the collection identified by the request-URL. Section 12.13, which defines the extended baseline semantics of UPDATE, does not include a similar statement, but I think it should. Is this the working group's intention? Would this be a reasonable edit to make in the next rev of the spec? Roy
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 17:25:38 UTC