- From: Nevermann, Dr., Peter <Peter.Nevermann@softwareag.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:43:14 +0100
- To: "'ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org'" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
OK, that clarifies. Thanks, Julian! - Peter. > -----Original Message----- > From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de] > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 14:40 > To: Nevermann, Dr., Peter; ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > Subject: RE: DTD of supported-method-set property > > > Peter, > > actually in the latest edit ([1]), it changed to be the > attribute "name" for > methods, the element <report> for reports and the element <prop> fpr > properties. > > I think that supported-method-set uses an attribute because you can't > marshall all legal method names as element names. > > Julian > > > [1] > <http://www.greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-deltav-versio > ning-20.1.htm# > _Toc524830525> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org > > [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of > Nevermann, Dr., > > Peter > > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:34 PM > > To: 'ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org' > > Subject: DTD of supported-method-set property > > > > > > Hi, > > > > this is very basic question compared to what is currently > beeing discussed > > on this list - (ashamed ;-) > > > > Comparing 3.1.3, 3.1.4 and 3.1.5 of the spec, I wonder why > "name" is an > > *attribute* of element "supported-method-set" while it is a > > *child* element > > in the cases of "supported-live-property-set" and > "supported-report-set". > > Why is that so? > > > > Regards, > > - Peter > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 03:43:27 UTC