- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 14:39:56 +0100
- To: "Nevermann, Dr., Peter" <Peter.Nevermann@softwareag.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Peter, actually in the latest edit ([1]), it changed to be the attribute "name" for methods, the element <report> for reports and the element <prop> fpr properties. I think that supported-method-set uses an attribute because you can't marshall all legal method names as element names. Julian [1] <http://www.greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-20.1.htm# _Toc524830525> > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org > [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Nevermann, Dr., > Peter > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:34 PM > To: 'ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org' > Subject: DTD of supported-method-set property > > > Hi, > > this is very basic question compared to what is currently beeing discussed > on this list - (ashamed ;-) > > Comparing 3.1.3, 3.1.4 and 3.1.5 of the spec, I wonder why "name" is an > *attribute* of element "supported-method-set" while it is a > *child* element > in the cases of "supported-live-property-set" and "supported-report-set". > Why is that so? > > Regards, > - Peter > > >
Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 08:40:53 UTC