- From: Kirmse, Daniel <daniel.kirmse@sap.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:13:40 +0100
- To: "Ietf-Dav-Versioning (E-mail)" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Hi,
suppose this:
/foo
|
+- /bar
|
+- foobar.c
all the resources are under version-control. Now suppose this sequence of
requests:
CHECKOUT /foo/bar
DAV:apply-to-version
(working-collection: /wc/wc1 auto-update: /foo/bar)
CHECKOUT /foo
DAV:apply-to-version
(working-collection: /wc/wc2, auto-update: /foo)
delete folder /foo/bar:
DELETE /wc/wc2/bar
or is it done via the real VCR? I hope not! The DELETE should be hidden
until checkin!
CHECKIN /wc/wc2
(applied to /foo -> the folder /bar and all its content is gone)
CHECKIN /wc/wc1
(must fail because the VCR the auto-update should go to is gone)
Questions:
1. Is this right?
2. If yes: Shouldn't the deletion be prevented or fail because a subfolder
is checked out and therefore some kind of "locked"?
Regards,
Daniel
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 11:33:18 UTC