- From: Kirmse, Daniel <daniel.kirmse@sap.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:13:40 +0100
- To: "Ietf-Dav-Versioning (E-mail)" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Hi, suppose this: /foo | +- /bar | +- foobar.c all the resources are under version-control. Now suppose this sequence of requests: CHECKOUT /foo/bar DAV:apply-to-version (working-collection: /wc/wc1 auto-update: /foo/bar) CHECKOUT /foo DAV:apply-to-version (working-collection: /wc/wc2, auto-update: /foo) delete folder /foo/bar: DELETE /wc/wc2/bar or is it done via the real VCR? I hope not! The DELETE should be hidden until checkin! CHECKIN /wc/wc2 (applied to /foo -> the folder /bar and all its content is gone) CHECKIN /wc/wc1 (must fail because the VCR the auto-update should go to is gone) Questions: 1. Is this right? 2. If yes: Shouldn't the deletion be prevented or fail because a subfolder is checked out and therefore some kind of "locked"? Regards, Daniel
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 11:33:18 UTC