- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:55:38 -0700
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org > [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff > > From: Tim Ellison [mailto:Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com] > > I agree that the default should be depth zero. > > I agree as well. I'll make that change unless anyone objects. > My objection is that if this is being done for consistency, then the spec should be consistent with RFC 2518. From section 8.1: "By default, the PROPFIND method without a Depth header MUST act as if a "Depth: infinity" header was included. " Section 8.8.8: "The Depth header is unnecessary as the default behavior of COPY on a collection is to act as if a "Depth: infinity" header had been submitted. " On the other hand, from section 9.2: "Methods which support the Depth header may choose not to support all of the header's values and may define, on a case by case basis, the behavior of the method if a Depth header is not present." Lisa
Received on Friday, 7 September 2001 12:56:22 UTC