- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:27:17 -0400
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com] Peter Raymond <Peter.Raymond@merant.com> >>> The second issue I have with the depth header is they way it is >>> defined inconsistently on each method that uses it....for >>> example on the UPDATE method if depth is not specified then >>> Depth: infinity is assumed... > "The request-URL identifies the set of possible update targets. If > Depth:0 is specified, the request-URL is the only possible update > target; otherwise, any member of the configuration rooted at the > request-URL is a possible update target." The deep operations only make sense when the request body includes a DAV:label-name element. I agree that the default should be depth zero. I agree as well. I'll make that change unless anyone objects. Cheers, Geoff
Received on Friday, 7 September 2001 09:16:18 UTC