CHECKIN an activity

• From: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
• Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 11:09:27 +0000
• To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
• Message-ID: <8025699D.003D4F82.00@d06mta07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>

>   Just how is a transacted change set supposed to
>    happen, then? Before, it was "accumulate the changes
>    into an activity, then merge the activity." What now?
>
> I'd support the introduction of the ability to CHECKIN
> an activity, to mean "atomically checkin all checked-out
> resources for that activity".  Does anyone object?  (pretty
> sneaky burying this question deep in this long message ...
> :-).

Just to show that people do read these long threads -- I think this is a
fine idea.

Tim

Received on Monday, 20 November 2000 06:17:36 UTC