Re: Missing advanced preconditions from PUT, MKCOL, COPY?

From: Geoffrey M. Clemm (geoffrey.clemm@rational.com)
Date: Mon, Sep 18 2000

Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 8/18/00 (Monday) 2pm-3pm EST"

Previous message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: Naive question"
In reply to: Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com: "Re: Missing advanced preconditions from PUT, MKCOL, COPY?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 12:49:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200009181649.MAA14367@tantalum.atria.com>
From: "Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: Re: Missing advanced preconditions from PUT, MKCOL, COPY?

Yes, I'll add this.  In particular, I'll say that when a server
automatically puts under version control any new resource created by
PUT, MKCOL, and COPY, then all the pre-conditions of VERSION-CONTROL
must be satisfied by the PUT, MKCOL, or COPY.

Cheers,
Geoff

   From: Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com

   Yes, that's right.

   "Vasta, John" <jvasta@rational.com> on 2000-09-15 06:06:07 PM

   With versioned collections, the PUT, MKCOL, and COPY methods can
   cause collections to be automatically modified. Shouldn't the
   advanced versioning section note that
   DAV:cannot-modify-parent-version-selector is an additional
   precondition for PUT and MKCOL, and
   DAV:cannot-modify-destination-parent-version-selector is an
   additional precondition for COPY?

Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 8/18/00 (Monday) 2pm-3pm EST"
Previous message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: Naive question"
In reply to: Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com: "Re: Missing advanced preconditions from PUT, MKCOL, COPY?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]