Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: Working resource locations"
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20000915064803.00b99d10@capm.assetvalue.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 06:49:57 -0700
To: "Jim Doubek" <jdoubek@macromedia.com>, "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
From: "Henry K. Harbury" <hharbury@assetvalue.com>
Subject: RE: Versioning TeleConf ... 2pm-3pm EST
I second Jim - 11 Eastern, 8:00 Pacific is ok, 7 is not.
-- Henry.
At 02:56 PM 9/12/00 -0700, Jim Doubek wrote:
>Being a west-coaster, 8 (11 Eastern) is ok with me, but 7 is not.
>
>- jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
> [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 1:44 PM
> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Versioning TeleConf ... 2pm-3pm EST
>
>
> 11am EST would of course be 8am on the west coast.
> Would this be a problem for the west coast folks?
>
> As for Jim Amsden's suggestion for 10am EST, this
> would be 7am west coast time, which I find unlikely
> to be very popular (:-). But I'll let the west
> coast folks comment on that.
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com [mailto:Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 5:01 AM
> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
> Subject: Versioning TeleConf ... 2pm-3pm EST
>
>
>
>
> I realize that (a) the teleconf has become something of an
> institution, and
> (b) I represent a low percentage of the participants ...
> but if people are
> indifferent to the traditional time that this call is
> scheduled I'd like to
> have it moved earlier in the day (since I am now at
> EST+5hrs). An ideal
> time for me would be 11am EST.
>
> Tim
Henry Harbury
Architect
MERANT
Henry.Harbury@MERANT.com
Tel (503) 617-2453
Fax (503) 645-4576
www.merant.com