Next message: Jim Amsden/Raleigh/IBM: "Re: Naive question"
From: "Jim Doubek" <jdoubek@macromedia.com>
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 14:56:27 -0700
Message-ID: <NEBBKGCJHMKNLDINHHCECEALCJAA.jdoubek@macromedia.com>
Subject: RE: Versioning TeleConf ... 2pm-3pm EST
Being a west-coaster, 8 (11 Eastern) is ok with me, but 7 is not.
- jim
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
[mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 1:44 PM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: RE: Versioning TeleConf ... 2pm-3pm EST
11am EST would of course be 8am on the west coast.
Would this be a problem for the west coast folks?
As for Jim Amsden's suggestion for 10am EST, this
would be 7am west coast time, which I find unlikely
to be very popular (:-). But I'll let the west
coast folks comment on that.
Cheers,
Geoff
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com [mailto:Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 5:01 AM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: Versioning TeleConf ... 2pm-3pm EST
I realize that (a) the teleconf has become something of an
institution, and
(b) I represent a low percentage of the participants ...
but if people are
indifferent to the traditional time that this call is
scheduled I'd like to
have it moved earlier in the day (since I am now at
EST+5hrs). An ideal
time for me would be 11am EST.
Tim