Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: Naive question"
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF0128B09E.0FCC1E72-ON8525695B.003FC786@raleigh.ibm.com>
From: "Jim Amsden/Raleigh/IBM" <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 07:37:03 -0400
Subject: Re: Versioning TeleConf Time Change?
How about Friday at 11:00 EST?
So does that mean:
... therefore I veto the 11am time change.
or
... therefore I can change when I run, so the change to 11am is OK?
I'm happy either way, so I'm just following the process.
Cheers,
Geoff
From: "Jim Amsden/Raleigh/IBM" <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 20:29:36 -0400
I usually run at 11:15, except on Fridays.
I'm inclined to use the following process:
- anyone can propose a new time for the call
- anyone can veto a proposed new time for the call
We'll change the time of the call if any proposed
new time is not veto'ed.
So far, I've gotten two new proposed times:
10am-EST and 11am-EST
JimD has veto'ed 10am-EST
JimA: did you want to veto 11am-EST, or did you
just want to try out 10am-EST first?
Cheers,
Geoff