Re: Versioning TeleConf Time Change?

From: Geoffrey M. Clemm (geoffrey.clemm@rational.com)
Date: Fri, Sep 15 2000

  • Next message: Jim Amsden/Raleigh/IBM: "Re: Versioning TeleConf Time Change?" 

    Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 07:33:39 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200009151133.HAA09589@tantalum.atria.com>
From: "Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: Re: Versioning TeleConf Time Change?


So does that mean:

... therefore I veto the 11am time change.

or

... therefore I can change when I run, so the change to 11am is OK?


I'm happy either way, so I'm just following the process.

Cheers,
Geoff

   From: "Jim Amsden/Raleigh/IBM" <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
   Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 20:29:36 -0400

   I usually run at 11:15, except on Fridays.


   I'm inclined to use the following process:
   - anyone can propose a new time for the call
   - anyone can veto a proposed new time for the call
   We'll change the time of the call if any proposed
   new time is not veto'ed.

   So far, I've gotten two new proposed times:
   10am-EST and 11am-EST
   JimD has veto'ed 10am-EST
   JimA: did you want to veto 11am-EST, or did you
      just want to try out 10am-EST first?

   Cheers,
   Geoff