Re: workspace header question

From: Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI (Boris_Bokowski@oti.com)
Date: Tue, Aug 22 2000

Next message: Juergen Reuter: "Where have DAV:revision-set and DAV:working-resource-id/URL-set gone?"

Previous message: Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI: "Re: are workspaces versionable?"
Maybe in reply to: Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI: "workspace header question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF9F467B33.4E956989-ON85256943.004D82B9@ott.oti.com>
From: "Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI" <Boris_Bokowski@oti.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 10:17:29 -0400
Subject: Re: workspace header question

I found the answer to my workspace header question in the archives:

Greg Stein on August 10:
>   Euh. Nope. Section 11.1 is the issue I'm referring to. It states that 
any
>   request with a Workspace header must fail if there is a corresponding
>   internal member.

Geoff Clemm on August 10:
> Wait, wait!!  That clause was supposed to be deleted.  We decided to
> kill it because of the reasons you describe below.  No wonder you
> don't like workspaces!

I should have read the previous posts more carefully. Sorry!

Boris.

Next message: Juergen Reuter: "Where have DAV:revision-set and DAV:working-resource-id/URL-set gone?"
Previous message: Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI: "Re: are workspaces versionable?"
Maybe in reply to: Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI: "workspace header question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]