Message-Id: <200007241756.NAA20973@tux.w3.org> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:55:56 -0400 To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org From: karasiuk@ca.ibm.com (by way of "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>) Subject: Mini scenario [freed from spam filter -rrs] Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:36:05 -0400 (EDT) From: karasiuk@ca.ibm.com To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org Message-ID: <87256926.0060A75E.00@d53mta05h.boulder.ibm.com> Can someone please look at this mini scenario, and tell me if the way that I used the properties conforms to the spec? Request: VERSION /foo /foo target: /r/1/foo /r/1/foo revision: ?? predecessor-set: null checkin-date: 00/07/24 09:00 Request: CHECKOUT /foo /foo target: /r/2/foo /r/1/foo revision: ?? predecessor-set: null checkin-date: 00/07/24 09:00 /r/2/foo checked-out: /r/1/foo Request: CHECKIN /foo /foo target: /r/2/foo /r/1/foo revision: ?? predecessor-set: null checkin-date: 00/07/24 09:00 /r/2/foo revision: ?? predecessor-set: /r/1/foo checkin-date: 00/07/24 09:10 Gary Karasiuk karasiuk@ca.ibm.com