Mini scenario

From: by way of (karasiuk@ca.ibm.com)
Date: Mon, Jul 24 2000

  • Next message: Jim Whitehead: "DAVer's guide to Pittsburgh IETF"

    Message-Id: <200007241756.NAA20973@tux.w3.org>
    Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:55:56 -0400
    To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
    From: karasiuk@ca.ibm.com (by way of "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>)
    Subject: Mini scenario
    
    [freed from spam filter -rrs]
    
    Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:36:05 -0400 (EDT)
    From: karasiuk@ca.ibm.com
    To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
    Message-ID: <87256926.0060A75E.00@d53mta05h.boulder.ibm.com>
    
    Can someone please look at this mini scenario, and tell me if the way that
    I used the properties conforms to the spec?
    
    Request:  VERSION /foo
    
    /foo
      target: /r/1/foo
    
    /r/1/foo
      revision: ??
      predecessor-set: null
      checkin-date: 00/07/24 09:00
    
    Request: CHECKOUT /foo
    
    /foo
      target: /r/2/foo
    
    /r/1/foo
      revision: ??
      predecessor-set: null
      checkin-date: 00/07/24 09:00
    
    /r/2/foo
      checked-out: /r/1/foo
    
    Request: CHECKIN /foo
    
    /foo
      target: /r/2/foo
    
    /r/1/foo
      revision: ??
      predecessor-set: null
      checkin-date: 00/07/24 09:00
    
    /r/2/foo
      revision: ??
      predecessor-set: /r/1/foo
      checkin-date: 00/07/24 09:10
    
    
    Gary Karasiuk
    karasiuk@ca.ibm.com