To: "Matt Bisson" <mbisson@Rational.Com> Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org Message-ID: <OF3543654E.E7DC2960-ON852568A8.00606662@ott.oti.com> From: "Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI" <Tim_Ellison@oti.com> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:34:25 -0500 Subject: RE: Label method body You're right! Hey, you can make me look like a dope anytime (it isn't difficult <g>) I'm not sure where I got LABEL <DAV:remove> from, so ignore me. Thanks Matt, Tim "Matt Bisson" <mbisson@Rati To: "Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI" <Tim_Ellison@oti.com> onal.Com> cc: Subject: RE: Label method body 20-03-00 11:02 AM I may have misunderstood your email (so I am mailing you directly so I don't sound like a dope :)), but in version 3.1 of the delta-v spec under LABEL (6.5), it says: The body of the request contains an XML document with either a DAV:add or a DAV:delete member. It doesn't seem to say anything about the remove element containing a label though... -----Original Message----- From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 10:19 AM To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org Subject: Label method body The label method body introduces an element <DAV:remove> defined as containing #PCDATA (i.e., the label). RFC2518 already contains a <DAV:remove> that contains a <DAV:prop> (i.e., for removing properties). We should change the element name so that we can merge DTDs unambiguously. Tim