Next message: Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI: "RE: Disappearing CHECKINs"
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFA3857734.5BF865C5-ON852568A8.005041A2@ott.oti.com>
From: "Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI" <Tim_Ellison@oti.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 09:37:02 -0500
Subject: RE: "Parent collection"
Sounds good.
Tim
"Clemm, Geoff"
<gclemm@rational.com> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Sent by: cc:
ietf-dav-versioning-requ Subject: RE: "Parent collection"
est@w3.org
19-03-00 10:26 PM
Good point. I've changed the wording of this section so that
the effect of the VERSION call is to "convert the versionable
resource into a versioned resource". Then there is no need to
mention the "parent collection", since no bindings need to be
changed.
Since the method is not a "conversion" method instead of a "creation
method", I've also changed the "success" status from a 201 to a 200.
Cheers,
Geoff
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim_Ellison@oti.com [mailto:Tim_Ellison@oti.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 4:05 PM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: "Parent collection"
In draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-03.1.doc Section 6.1 VERSION
Postconditions refer to the 'parent collection'. This term is undefined,
and in the face of BINDs could be plural.
Tim