Next message: Clemm, Geoff: "RE: Disappearing CHECKINs"
Message-ID: <65B141FB11CCD211825700A0C9D609BC01D4D78B@chef.lex.rational.com>
From: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@Rational.Com>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 22:26:08 -0500
Subject: RE: "Parent collection"
Good point. I've changed the wording of this section so that
the effect of the VERSION call is to "convert the versionable
resource into a versioned resource". Then there is no need to
mention the "parent collection", since no bindings need to be
changed.
Since the method is not a "conversion" method instead of a "creation
method", I've also changed the "success" status from a 201 to a 200.
Cheers,
Geoff
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim_Ellison@oti.com [mailto:Tim_Ellison@oti.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 4:05 PM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: "Parent collection"
In draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-03.1.doc Section 6.1 VERSION
Postconditions refer to the 'parent collection'. This term is undefined,
and in the face of BINDs could be plural.
Tim